On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Actually, now that I think about it, the planner already has >>> datatype-specific knowledge about boolean equality (see >>> simplify_boolean_equality). It would take just a few more lines of code >>> there to recognize "x <> true" and "x <> false" as additional variant >>> spellings of the generic "x" or "NOT x" constructs. Not sure if it's >>> worth the trouble though; how many people really write such things? > >> I don't know, but there's probably somebody. I probably did it myself >> a few times, when I was just starting out. If it's easy, it seems >> worth doing. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-07/msg00164.php > > regards, tom lane
Oh, cool. Sorry, I missed the fact that that email was almost a month old. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
