Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Actually, now that I think about it, the planner already has >> datatype-specific knowledge about boolean equality (see >> simplify_boolean_equality). It would take just a few more lines of code >> there to recognize "x <> true" and "x <> false" as additional variant >> spellings of the generic "x" or "NOT x" constructs. Not sure if it's >> worth the trouble though; how many people really write such things?
> I don't know, but there's probably somebody. I probably did it myself > a few times, when I was just starting out. If it's easy, it seems > worth doing. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-07/msg00164.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
