Andrew Chernow wrote: > >> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only >> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this, >> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thoughts? >> >> > > Doesn't sound urgent to me. If it were my decision, I'd punt it to 8.5.
Ok. Agreed then - added to the commitfest page. > Hard to keep that win32 acl stuff leak free. There is always a cleanup > goto because you need 6 billion objects to answer any question :o Yeah, true. -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
