Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, the way it is now is just broken, so IMO we have to either fix it
> > or remove it altogether.
>
> > Since having sequence_name in there doesn't let you do anything you
> > can't do without it, and there's no easy way to fix it, I'd say let's
> > just remove it in 8.3 and do nothing in backbranches.
>
> I don't think this is a good idea. It's removing functionality that
> works fine as long as you don't rename sequences. Also, there's still
> the notion of someday providing a system catalog or view that shows
> parameters of all sequences, and in that view the current column set of
> an individual sequence would be what we'd want.
>
> My inclination is to leave it alone for now until we have an approach to
> providing that view, and at that time decide what to do about individual
> sequences. If we have to change the API, then so be it, but lets do it
> just once not twice.
Added to TODO:
o Have ALTER SEQUENCE RENAME rename the sequence name stored
in the sequence table
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-09/msg00092.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-10/msg00007.php
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
