Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am amused by the fact that we store the sequence name in the sequence >> itself though. > > Yeah, it's a bit pointless. One possible response to this gripe would > be to take the name out of the sequence itself. However, that would > likely break client-side code for no very good reason.
Would it be possible to create a SELECT rule on the sequence that returns the sequence name from the catalog instead? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
