> Jerome ALET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now suppose you define a rule to act differently on delete or update
>
> Hmm, that's the first good argument I've seen in this thread. An ON
> DELETE rule could possibly invoke processing quite different from an
> ON UPDATE rule, and in that case it could make sense to want to be
> able to allow access to one operation but not the other.
>
> I'm still pretty nervous about trying to make this change at this point
> in the 7.0 cycle though, considering that all we have to work from is
> an incomplete 6.5.* patch (no docs, no pg_dump fix, even assuming he got
> all the backend code changes...).
>
> What do you think?
Clearly, not significant. I will add it to the TODO.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
