> In a near future, I suppose you will allow acls to work on fields too. > If you do it, you will notice that delete and update are really different in > this case too. > > If you disagree with me, then document your "feature" and please stop wasting > my time. > We are weighing the severity of the problem with the risk to beta stability. We have decided beta stability is more important in this case. I have your patch, and we will put this on the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Tom Lane
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome ALET
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Tom Lane
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome Alet
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome Alet
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome Alet
- Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian