On Saturday, February 12, 2011, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghega...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 February 2011 14:22, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> Note the lack of a delete - that's the point here; it's not needed >> because as soon as the smart pointer goes out of scope, it's >> destructor will delete foo. That means you don't have to remember to >> include the delete in each of the many exit points of the code. >> >> See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Acquisition_Is_Initialization > > "Resource Acquisition is Initialization" is a terrible name.
Couldn't agree more. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
