On 12 February 2011 14:22, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > Note the lack of a delete - that's the point here; it's not needed > because as soon as the smart pointer goes out of scope, it's > destructor will delete foo. That means you don't have to remember to > include the delete in each of the many exit points of the code. > > See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Acquisition_Is_Initialization
"Resource Acquisition is Initialization" is a terrible name. Some people call it "scope bound resource management", which makes a lot more sense, but isn't as widely known. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
