Looks good to me. On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Adding to this - https://2022.stateofjs.com/en-US/libraries/testing/ here > is what the usage says. > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Hackers, >> >> I suggest we should replace jasmine+karma combination with jest for the >> following reasons: >> 1. Jest is a zero dependency, less config testing framework. >> 2. Has built in support for React. Easy to write React test cases. >> Jasmine is more for Angular than React. >> 3. Jasmine requires enzyme to be installed separately, which is not >> always up to date with latest React versions. >> https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/issues/2524 it still doesn't support >> React 18. >> 3. Used by Facebook for React testing. >> 4. In built code coverage. >> 5. Allows React component mocking which is not possible with jasmine yet. >> 6. It is jasmine compatible, so easy to migrate. >> 7. Future proof. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Aditya Toshniwal >> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* >> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> >> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >> > > > -- > Thanks, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* > <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >
