Adding to this - https://2022.stateofjs.com/en-US/libraries/testing/ here is what the usage says.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:53 PM Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Hackers, > > I suggest we should replace jasmine+karma combination with jest for the > following reasons: > 1. Jest is a zero dependency, less config testing framework. > 2. Has built in support for React. Easy to write React test cases. Jasmine > is more for Angular than React. > 3. Jasmine requires enzyme to be installed separately, which is not always > up to date with latest React versions. > https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/issues/2524 it still doesn't support > React 18. > 3. Used by Facebook for React testing. > 4. In built code coverage. > 5. Allows React component mocking which is not possible with jasmine yet. > 6. It is jasmine compatible, so easy to migrate. > 7. Future proof. > > What do you think? > > -- > Thanks, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* > <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- Thanks, Aditya Toshniwal pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
