They would need to be cleaned up (many of them tell people to “cd $PETSC_DIR/$PETSC_ARCH/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials”), but yeah they are a pretty useful on-ramp.
It would also be cool if they followed some structured path, where the Vec->Mat->PC/KSP->SNES/DM/TS progression illustrated some evolution of abstraction for a single particular problem. Start from finite difference and build up to FEM maybe? Not sure. > On Feb 18, 2022, at 18:58, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should we put those back up? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 7:34 PM Jacob Faibussowitsch <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > That was an early version of the new docs. Patrick, Hannah, Hong and I wrote > those tutorials as we were testing out the new format. The QuickStart > tutorial made it into the final set pretty much unchanged, but not sure if > the rest of the sections did. > >> On Feb 18, 2022, at 15:23, Matthew Knepley <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> How did these? >> >> >> https://wg-beginners.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/introductory_tutorial.html >> >> <https://wg-beginners.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/introductory_tutorial.html> >> >> They are not on the new site, and people here liked them. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments >> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments >> lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
