On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Barry Smith wrote: > > Run release on my machine and it worked correctly. (with bibtex_bibfiles = > ['../tex/petsc.bib','../tex/petscapp.bib’] patch). producing 3.14.2 > > The last run of latest (release) on readthedocs 2 days ago failed. > > Run my branch of release now on readthedocs and it produces > https://docs.petsc.org/en/barry-2020-12-26-docs-add-bibtext-release/ > <https://docs.petsc.org/en/barry-2020-12-26-docs-add-bibtext-release/> which > has the 3.14.2 as it should be. > > So the problem could be readthedocs has never properly run on latest > (release) past the 3.14.0 version, hence there is not a newer version there. > Or something else? > > https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/3513
merged the branch - and the docs are now regenerated. Satish > > > BTW: I think the naming is all wrong for readthedocs and we'll need to fix. > > Currently latest -> release (readthedocs says latest should point to > the development version). I propose we change to > > release -> release version > master/main -> master/main version > latest -> master/main version > > > Barry > > > > On Dec 25, 2020, at 4:28 AM, Pierre Jolivet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > https://docs.petsc.org/en/latest/ <https://docs.petsc.org/en/latest/> shows > > "PETSc 3.14.0 documentation” in the header and footer. > > Shouldn’t it either display 3.14 or 3.14.2? > > > > Thanks, > > Pierre > > > > <Screenshot 2020-12-13 at 12.31.24 PM.png> > >
