On 6/1/07, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope.  Hash is mostly about meaning, and very little about implementation.
Please don't assume that I name things according to Standard Names in
Computer Science.  I name things in English.

Then why did we need a separate "use English" pragma? :)

Are you the one who originally came up with "hash" for %vars?  IIRC,
they were officially called just "associative arrays" through Perl4,
but "hash" was a well-understood community nickname for them for some
time before you canonized it with ref($var) eq 'HASH' in Perl5...

--
Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to