> I'm sticking to non-words here, as I mentally parse not and true as > single-arg subs, single-arg subs as unary operators, etcetera. I can't > help it, but I have absolutely no idea how to determine the difference. > Is it &prefix:<not> or just ¬? I have no idea. I do know that it's > &infix:<x>, not &x.
Though, P6 mayl give us the ability to create circumfix operators (as seen in the entire reduce thread). I think that syntax will also allow for functions to be parsed as infix operators, right? Rob
