On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Rob Kinyon wrote: : > I'm sticking to non-words here, as I mentally parse not and true as : > single-arg subs, single-arg subs as unary operators, etcetera. I can't : > help it, but I have absolutely no idea how to determine the difference. : > Is it &prefix:<not> or just ¬? I have no idea. I do know that it's : > &infix:<x>, not &x. : : Though, P6 mayl give us the ability to create circumfix operators (as : seen in the entire reduce thread). I think that syntax will also allow : for functions to be parsed as infix operators, right?
Sure, but in that case we usually call them methods. :-) Larry
