>>>>> "MF" == Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  MF> All~
  MF> On 5/2/05, Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >> >>>>> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  >> 
  LW> multi sub opensocket (
  LW> Str +$mode = 'rw',
  LW> Str +$encoding = 'auto',
  LW> Str [EMAIL PROTECTED]) returns IO;
  >> 
  >> and how will that support async (non-blocking) connects? or listen
  >> sockets? i assume this is sorta the replacement for IO::Socket which is
  >> a pure key/value api (except for the shortcut single arg host:port
  >> which is nice to also support). for async you need to provide a callback
  >> in the signature (beyond all the other socket args), an optional timeout
  >> (with its own callback). the callbacks could be defaulted to subs in the
  >> current module/namespace but the coder may also want an OO callback
  >> which needs an object and method. another little optional argument is a
  >> private data field. sure an object callback could handle on a per object
  >> basis. but what if one object wanted to manage multiple async socket
  >> connections? each one needs to be identified in the callbacks which is
  >> what the private data is for. it is passed as an arg to the callback
  >> sub/method.

  MF> Currying obviates the need for everything but a sub callback.  If you
  MF> want a callback to a method, curry the object.  If you want private
  MF> data, curry the data.  After you are done currying you will have a
  MF> simple sub to pass in as the callback, the peasants rejoice, and
  MF> libraries will have a simpler interface.

i like the concept but how would that work without actually creating
closures? to convert a sub call to a method on an object is code, not
just presetting args (which is what i gather currying is). now just
using a closure would work but i am not in favor of allocating them just
for this when other optional args can do the job. even with the full
interface as i want it, you can use closures as your callbacks and keep
it shorter. i just don't see the win of more code vs more args.

uri

-- 
Uri Guttman  ------  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -------- http://www.stemsystems.com
--Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding-
Search or Offer Perl Jobs  ----------------------------  http://jobs.perl.org

Reply via email to