Trond Michelsen wrote: > There's always the possibility of supporting SI's binary prefixes ;) > > http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
An excellant idea. I was unaware of that standard, but was trying to head that direction in my last posting. Someone thought it wouldn't work with imaginary numbers, but there actually is no ambiguity if the imaginary i must immediately follow the number, and the metric suffix follow that, if both exist. -- Glenn ===== Due to the current economic situation, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off until further notice.
