Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 05:12 PM 10/10/2001 +0200, RaFaL Pocztarski wrote: > > >BTW, I was thinking once that numeral literals like 4k or 10G > >(meaning 4*2**10, 10*2**30) would be very nice. What do you think? > > I think the meaning of the suffices are sufficiently vague as to make me > uncomfortable supporting them. Is 1K 1024 or 1000? I can make a good case > for both, and that's never a good sign.
I was thinking about powers of 1024, as powers of 1000 are of course easy to write in decimal system (4e9, 4_000_000_000, but 4_294_967_296 and 4*2**30). - RaFaL Pocztarski, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
