I don't think that extreme positions ("minimalist!" "bloater!") helps here. I think the important question to ask about any given feature is: what will it let me do? Features with no good answer to this question obviously have no place in core. Attempting to align with one or another philosophical camp before pragmatically evaluating the benefits of something seems a waste of everyone's time. Nat
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeremy Howard
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Tim Bunce