At 09:36 AM 4/9/01 +0200, Ariel Scolnicov wrote: > > > Hmm... programs that have perl one-liners inside them might be > > > troublesome. > > > > Why not: > > > > perl -e 'perl 5 one-liner' > > > > perl --cmd 'perl 6 one-liner' > > > > i.e. maintain the "-e" switch as a backward compatibility flag, with a new > > cmd line flag for perl 6. > >One liners are supposed to be SHORT. `--cmd' is LONG. If we MUST go >the multiflagged way, why not reflect `-e' to get the `-6' flag? At >the very least, I want a short flag! But by the time people learned to use '-6' we'd have Perl 7 out. Whatever we come up with, let's figure out how to avoid having to change it the next time we change Perl. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Tim Bunce
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian