On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 01:27:52PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > I'm not against a "cleaner" way to do qw() in principle, but I > definitely think <> is not it for a lot of reasons (glob, readline, > can't use =>, iterators, ...) Sheesh. Yes, those would be problems with using <> in Perl 5. However, we are not designing Perl 5. -- `First Up Against The Wall When The Revolution Comes! Woohoo! So long as they promise to use latex gloves, I'm happy. :)' - Thorfinn, in the Monastery.
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Peter Scott
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Bart Lateur
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Mark Koopman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Perl6 MOP (was RE: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns) David Whipp
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Fred Heutte
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Fred Heutte
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Eric Roode