On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:10:24PM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2001 15:22:40 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > > > I suggest > >that we simply create another q-op to do the qw-ish things you're proposing. > >Perhaps qi() for "interpolate" or something else. > > qqw Why I'm reminded of car, cdr, cadr, cdar, cddar, cadar, ... -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Siracusa
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Richard Proctor
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Uri Guttman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Peter Scott
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Bart Lateur
- RE: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Mark Koopman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Perl6 MOP (was RE: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns) David Whipp