On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:45:02AM -0700, Damien Neil wrote: > I think many of us are resigned to losing . for concatination; I know > I can live with that. I just don't want to have this result in ~, ^, > or any other C-style punctuation operator getting renamed. That's my position. I'd rather live without a concatenation operator than use ~ or ^ for it. But if we must have a concatenation operator, I'd rather it be "cc" or "_" (I didn't like the underscore at first, but it's grown on me a little) or some other punctuation that doesn't already have some well-established-across-multiple-languages meaning. anyway, my two cents ... -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Casey West
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Nathan Wiger
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g David L. Nicol
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Simon Cozens
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Michael G Schwern
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g John Porter
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damian Conway
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte