On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > And I'm tired of hearing the argument that Perl programmers can't get > used to a different operator for concatenation. I know better--after > all, Perl is probably what got them used to . in the first place. If > you can teach dogs to salivate at a bell, you can probably teach them > to salivate at a dog biscuit. :-) I think many of us are resigned to losing . for concatination; I know I can live with that. I just don't want to have this result in ~, ^, or any other C-style punctuation operator getting renamed. I like the fact that Perl follows the same operator conventions as C, C++, Java and others in this area; breaking with tradition here for the sake of aligning . feels inelegant. Renaming . to cc wouldn't bother me half so much. - Damien
- a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Casey West
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Nathan Wiger
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g David L. Nicol
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Simon Cozens
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Michael G Schwern
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g John Porter
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damian Conway
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte