James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ahh, bingo. That's what a number of people (inculding me) are > suggesting -- a :functional / :pure / :stateless / > :somthingelseIdontrecall attribute attachable to a sub. The experience from gcc, which has a similar attribute, is that such an attribute will be fairly rarely used and that most of your gains will come from managing to teach the compiler to figure out that information for itself. This will probably be harder in Perl than in C because C can afford to take more time to do global optimization passes. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Juanma Barranquero
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Piers Cawley
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... David L. Nicol
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Uri Guttman
- RE: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... David Whipp