-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:36:48 -0800, "Hong Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The function in Ada can not have any side effect, i.e. no change to > globals. Unless my reading of the Ada 95 standard is wrong, there's nothing that precludes functions having side effects. The only thing an Ada function cannot do is having "out" or "in out" parameters, so it cannot modify its arguments, and even that can be circumvented (as you can pass "in" access parameters). /L/e/k/t/u -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOsOiu/4C0a0jUw5YEQKjQwCeP2Aeu6aJsdpP3asvcQDS+dyk2aoAoKS5 2gJ1o0xX1lfa0hXrVff1tPvx =t4je -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dave Mitchell
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Juanma Barranquero
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Piers Cawley
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... David L. Nicol
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Uri Guttman
- RE: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... David Whipp