On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:54:33PM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > I rather like the idea that contract names are themselves namespace
> > 
> > I rather dislike it: I think we are trying to stuff to much information
> > on the package namespaces.
> 
> Well, I didn't say *package* namespace; I'm just pointing out that
> contract names can probably use the same kind of hierarchical
> categorization that other names do.

Ahh, okay.

> 
> > luck"?  No thanks, that's exactly the same mess we are now with the
> > package names.
> 
> When you come up with a solution to this problem, please send an
> email to ICANN.

I'm not claiming to have solution: I claim that the com.sun.java.Gorkulator
isn't one.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Reply via email to