On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:47:29PM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> A DNS name is assuming too much about the organizational
> structure and a mile long hex digit isn't very friendly, and neither
> of them is very descriptive.  "XPG4 SysV IPC" would be. (I just made
> that one up.)
Oh, I quite agree with your first (as quoted) sentance.  I just don't see
how as "XPG4 SysV IPC" is any better then IPC::SysV::XPG4.  And /neither/ of
them is good enough to be a contract name -- I'm certian that there's more
then one possible way to bind XPG4's SysV IPC scheme into perl.  (And I
don't even know what XPG4 is.)

Speaking of contract names, is Damien about?

         -=- James Mastros
-- 
"My country 'tis of thee, of y'all i'm rappin'!  Lan where my brothers
fought, land where our King was shot -- from every building top, let freedom
happen!"
        -=- Monique, Sinfest[.net]
AIM: theorbtwo       homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/

Reply via email to