[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It might makes sense to have some other functions giving units
> since some point in the past next to time() though.
How about time($)
it could take an offset. Not
time(30000)
being the same as
(time() + 30000)
That would be silly; but what if
time(315532800) #perl-defined to mean secs since 1970 GMT
reset the internal offset to whatever you wanted?
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"gorkulator borked. Please investigate."
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Damian Conway
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David L. Nicol
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
