On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:39:25 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Why the urge to move it out of the core? Should perl6 be like Python, >where you first need to do a gazillion imports before you can do anything >useful? Say goodbye to quick one-liners then. It doesn't have to be like that. Functions that are not in the core can still be automatically loaded, but only if your code actually uses them. That could make the perl kernel a lot smaller than it is now, and hopefully, make it load faster. -- Bart.
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Damian Conway
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David L. Nicol
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros