On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:57:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Perhaps some of the more grossly UNIX specific things like getpwnam's
> > extended family and the SysV IPC stuff?
>
> But why? What is it going to buy you?
The fact is, they don't need to be there.
And there isn't really a good reason for having them there.
So, since we're starting from scratch, we're not getting rid of them.
We're merely not putting them in.
--
God gave man two ears and one tongue so that we listen twice as much as
we speak.
-- Arab proverb
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Cantrell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? nick
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Uri Guttman
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Grove
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
