On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:43:38PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > The core's going to look big, but be small What, like am inside-out TARDIS? -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced ** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Mitchell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Cantrell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? nick
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Uri Guttman
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens