On Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:15 AM, Tom Christiansen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >POD, presumably. Or maybe son-of-POD; it would be nice to have better > >support for tables and lists. > > We did this for the camel. Which, I remind the world, was > written in pod. > > ''tom Uh... wow seriously, that impresses me. With that I reiterate my personal conclusions that playing too much funk with POD would be a disaster (including moving to something completely unpodly, like XML). Tom... wow. Is there anyway I could get the source for perusal? I'll supply O'Reilly with a copy of my book receipt to show that I own it. I want to see this in action.
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docum... Johan Vromans