Garrett Goebel wrote: > From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > As I said earlier, why don't we just define a syntax for > > *anything* to be used as an extension language, and let > > the, er, market decide? > > Peaceful coexistance... what a concept. Sounds to me like the real issue is that writing pod converters is harder than it ought to be (rather like the situation with XS). I think most people don't realize that they can write a converter if they want to. -- John Porter By pressing down a special key It plays a little melody
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for d... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docum... Johan Vromans