On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 16:39:04 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: >I repeat: > >> >All of the other features offered by Lincoln Stein's CGI.pm should remain, >> >but should not be deeply integrated into Perl6. > ^^^ >:-) > >The proposed 'use cgi;' pragma is concerned with gluing Perl into a cgi >context. No more, no less. Good. >I'm open to suggestions if the nominclature/distinction is too confusing. It *is* confusing. It sounded as if you wanted the whole CGI.pm module to be turned into a pragma. I like taint. I like %CGI. I like %HTTP. Form processing, basic header generation; I think that should be it. -- Bart.
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support tadmc
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur