On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 12:04:50AM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:50:28AM +0100, Richard Proctor wrote: > > On Mon 25 Sep, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > > > Turn on tainting > > > > What would it do on a platform that does not support Tainting? > > Is this a real issue? Is there a platform where tainting isn't > supported? I wouldn't think so. Tainting is a Perl thing. Perl does it's best to mark "unsafe" things as tainted. What's unsafe and Perl's best vary from platform to platform, but tainting still happens. (But this is from a guy who has only used but 6 or 7 of the OSes that Perl has been ported to) -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support tadmc
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v1) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur