Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support

[Nathan Wiger]

Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> This header functionality is application specific and does not belong in
> the core any more than the socket stuff which seems to be on its way
> out. I don't see why this has be implemented in the core in C.
> 
> Once again, if core means core modules, and as a part of cgi.pm or
> headers.pm or some such I am not concerned. And a switch for tainting
> and inclusion of this module sounds peachy. No core.

Yes, I believe that is the idea, at least currently.

CGI.pm is also massive because it also includes a whole bunch of h2()
and like methods that we wouldn't need here. The idea is just to cover
basic stuff that modules like CGI.pm could potentially build on.

-Nate