At 07:09 PM 9/27/00 -0400, James Mastros wrote: >From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Nathan Wiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:08 PM > > 'no taint' and 'use taint' shouldn't affect whether data is tainted--the > > rules for that should stay in effect. What they should alter instead is > > perl's response to tainted data while they're in effect. In a 'use taint' > > block perl should check, while in a 'no taint' block it shouldn't. >Couldn't have said it better myself. And god knows I've tried. <G> > >It might be nice if the result of a calculation was never tainted when the >calculation was in a 'no taint' block. Yerk. No, that's bad. The data is still tainted--the fact that it flowed through a "no taint" block doesn't make it any more trustworthy. Tainting really can't be dealt with like that. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support James Mastros
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... James Mastros
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support James Mastros
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... iain truskett