On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:04:26AM -0400, Ken Rich wrote:
> On the further note, though, I dislike the idea of overloading the
> =for label for =print purposes. I will modify the RFC.
Well, its not like the =for label is used much anyway... (yes, that is
a troll for someone to tell me otherwise).
In fact, I like "=for somewhere else" :)
--
Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
Like you've never accidentally spanked a midget.
-- Siobain http://www.goats.com/archive/index.html?000106
