> POD readers will currently ignore =for and =begin/=end blocks with a
> name they don't recognize.
Thanks, that is a good idea. RTM, Kenny. Guess I am so allergic to
the foreign formatter stuff that my eye slides right off that
paragraph. And the labelless =clip grew out of the =print rather than
the order presented. On the further note, though, I dislike the idea
of overloading the =for label for =print purposes. I will modify the RFC.
On the problem end of an =clip-like feature is that the creeping
featurist in me will start wanting an =endclip type of thing so that
more complex pod can be =printed.
--
-ken rich
