David L. Nicol wrote: > > For sets, hashes are a better perl representation. I think you must have missed some of this discussion. Rather than reiterate my contributions, I'll point you into the archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language%40perl.org/msg03425.html http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language%40perl.org/msg03441.html -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Tom Christiansen
- Please take RFC 179 discussion ... skud
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set... Chaim Frenkel