dLux wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've posted an RFC about transaction-enabled variables (RFC130:
> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/130.pod), but I didn't get too much response
> about that. Does anyone have comment about that? I want to clarify
> the language part of that (new keyword, new pragma), and if it is
> clear, I want to take part in the detailed design of the
> implementation.
>
> dLux
> --
> "Don't THINK you are - KNOW you are"
> (Morpheus, The Matrix)
I think it would be a good thing, and would be another things can
distinguish Perl from the other languages like pattern matching once
did. It strikes me as one of those things that are going to end up
adding a whole lot of power that wasn't expected, once people figure
them out.
--
David Corbin
Mach Turtle Technologies, Inc.
http://www.machturtle.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
