Nathan Torkington wrote: > > Exporter is pure Perl, but > I'd love to see its functionality moved into the core (or, indeed, > replaced by a general compile-time interface setup with separate > runtime execution semantics) for speed reasons. Anyone RFC'ing this yet? This time I'm *not* volunteering, but just pointing out one that could be missed. Seems like this has lots of dependencies on what happens with lexical/dynamic variables, symbol tables and typeglobs. Which reminds, anyone gonna RFC the rumored death of typeglobs? :-) -Nate
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) Larry Wall
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) Steve Fink
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... skud
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... John Porter
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Decklin Foster
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink