* John Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [17 Aug 2000 03:02]: > Nathan Torkington wrote: > > John Porter writes: > > > I really don't feel that strongly about it! > > > > If you think something is good, then argue for it. If you don't, > > don't. > I *do* think it's good. I'm arguing for it because it's something I'd > like to see happen. But I'm not passionate about it. Additionally, someone else may take to the idea and then argue passionately for it. They just may not have thought enough about the topic to come up with the idea. How often have you ever said "Hey! That's cool! Wish I'd thought of that!"? cheers, -- iain truskett, aka Koschei. <http://eh.org/~koschei/> Emacs is a nice OS - but it lacks a good text editor. That's why I am using Vim. -- Anonymous.
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Chaim Frenkel