Nathan Torkington wrote: > John Porter writes: > > I really don't feel that strongly about it! > > If you think something is good, then argue for it. If you don't, don't. I *do* think it's good. I'm arguing for it because it's something I'd like to see happen. But I'm not passionate about it. If it turns out not to happen, I'm not going to pack up my marbles and go home. And I'm not going to keep arguing about it endlessly. This was kind of my way of saying, "this was fun, let's talk about something else for a while." Sorry. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... John Porter
- Re: Devils advocacy (Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... Karl Glazebrook