> Better yet, DWIM. If I write > > print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > > and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as > it stands. I initially was thinking this too, but there's a major problem: print "Your stuff is: @stuff\n"; I want this to *always* print out the _value_ of @stuff, even if it's unititalized. Perl's already smart enough. I think getting in the habit of writing: $email = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Is the better thing to do. -Nate
- RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In string @ mus... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In str... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... John Porter
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or re... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or re... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In str... Mark-Jason Dominus