> The strict directive, is set to croak when an attempt to change the > value of constant $str22 is made. Use of > > use strict(constdie); Overall the proposal looks good. However, I think this should just be "use strict 'constants'". This makes it consistent: use strict qw(vars subs constants); The mode of operation for strict is to die on errors. As such, the "die" in "constdie" is redundant. And while "constants" is longer than "consts", it's a word and much easier to remember (your brain chunks words but not non-words).* Then, if you just want to issue warnings, do something like "use warnings 'constants'". -Nate * However, if the keyword ends up being 'const' then 'consts' might be more appropriate.
- RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing James Mastros
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Dan Sugalski
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong