At 11:15 AM 8/14/00 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: >I'm going to actually ask for a new mailing sublist, probably called >-object, on which this should be discussed. There's lots and lots and >lots and lots of details to work out. It might be best to wait a bit and see how the proposed internal representation settles down first. You may find a lot of this isn't actually necessary. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing James Mastros
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Dan Sugalski
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong