Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "NW" == Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> NW> Also, how about just $@->id? Shorter and I would argue the "unique_" is
> NW> really redundant (id's are usually unique, hence the name
> NW> "identifiers").
> 
> Not really.
> 
> Consider: Chaim is an identifier. But not unique.

Ok, but when we're talking methods, we have the choice of defining them.
The definition of $@->id could be "a unique error id", even though the
func wasn't $@->a_unique_error_id.

My only point is less is more. "new", "my", "our", etc, etc. $@->id,
$@->code, $@->errno, are all shorter than $@->unique_id and, IMO, carry
the same semantics.

-Nate

Reply via email to