Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > >>>>> "NW" == Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > NW> Also, how about just $@->id? Shorter and I would argue the "unique_" is > NW> really redundant (id's are usually unique, hence the name > NW> "identifiers"). > > Not really. > > Consider: Chaim is an identifier. But not unique. Ok, but when we're talking methods, we have the choice of defining them. The definition of $@->id could be "a unique error id", even though the func wasn't $@->a_unique_error_id. My only point is less is more. "new", "my", "our", etc, etc. $@->id, $@->code, $@->errno, are all shorter than $@->unique_id and, IMO, carry the same semantics. -Nate
- RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should have a Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated er... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Juanma Barranquero